No Influence of Asundexian on Cardiac Repolarization.

Inhibition of activated factor XI reduces thrombogenesis while maintaining physiological hemostasis, with the expectation of reduced bleeding risk compared with standard of care in the clinical setting. Asundexian (BAY 2433334), an activated factor XI inhibitor, is in clinical development for the prevention of thromboembolic events. The effect of asundexian and its plasma metabolite M10 on cardiac repolarization and potential interactions with the hNav1.5 sodium, hCav1.2 calcium, and human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium channels was investigated in vitro. Additionally, asundexian effects on cardiac parameters and electrocardiogram were examined in telemetered beagle dogs. A randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover, thorough QT study in healthy adults evaluated the influence of 50 and 150 mg of asundexian on the corrected QT interval, including 400 mg of moxifloxacin as positive control. Across all studies, asundexian and M10 were not associated with any effects on cardiac repolarization. The largest in vitro effects of asundexian (approximately 20% inhibition) were seen for hCav1.2 and hERG. Throughout the thorough QT study, the upper limits of the one-sided 95% confidence interval of placebo-corrected mean changes from baseline in Fridericia corrected QT for 50 and 150 mg of asundexian were below Δ = 10 milliseconds. Asundexian demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles.

Results From Drug-Drug Interaction Studies In Vitro and In Vivo Investigating the Inhibitory Effect of Finerenone on the Drug Transporters BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In vitro and in vivo studies were performed with the novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone to assess the relevance of inhibitory effects on the transporters breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), and OATP1B3. These transporters are involved in the disposition of a number of drugs, including statins. Statins are also a frequent comedication in patients receiving finerenone. Therefore, inhibitory effects on BCRP and OATPs are of potential clinical relevance. METHODS: The effect on the transport of specific substrates of BCRP and OATP1B1/1B3 was assessed in cell-based in vitro assays with finerenone or its metabolites. A fixed-sequence crossover study in 14 healthy male volunteers investigated the effects of finerenone (40 mg once daily) on the pharmacokinetics of the index substrate rosuvastatin (5 mg) administered alone, simultaneously with, or approximately 4 h before finerenone. The effect of finerenone on the endogenous OATP substrates coproporphyrin I and III was also assessed. RESULTS: Based on in vitro findings and threshold values proposed in regulatory guidelines, finerenone appeared to be a potentially relevant inhibitor of all three transporters. Relevant inhibition could also not be ruled out for the finerenone metabolites M1a (OATP1B1) and M3a (OATP1B1 and OAT1B3), which prompted an investigation into the relevance of these findings in vivo. After administration on a background of finerenone 40 mg, all point estimates of area under the curve ratios (114.47% [rosuvastatin], 99.62% [coproporphyrin I; simultaneous], and 105.28% [rosuvastatin; 4 h separation]) and maximum concentration ratios (111.24% [rosuvastatin], 101.22% [coproporphyrin I], 89.14% [coproporphyrin III; simultaneous], and 96.84% [rosuvastatin; 4 h separation]) of the investigated substrates were within 80.0-125%. In addition, the 90% confidence intervals of the ratios were within the conventional no-effect boundaries of 80.0% and 125% for rosuvastatin after temporally separated administration, and for coproporphyrin I and III. CONCLUSION: Administration of finerenone 40 mg once daily confers no risk of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with substrates of BCRP, OATP1B1, or OATP1B3. The potential for relevant inhibition of these transporters suggested by in vitro findings was not confirmed in vivo.

Finerenone is a drug that is used to reduce the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Taking more than one medicine, and often several at the same time, is common in these patients; therefore, it is important to investigate the drug­drug interaction potential of finerenone. These studies were carried out to assess the interaction potential of finerenone and its metabolites in both laboratory experiments and healthy volunteers. Initial laboratory experiments indicated that finerenone and its metabolites could inhibit transporters used by other drugs. A study in healthy volunteers was performed and demonstrated that finerenone is not associated with any clinically meaningful changes to drugs that are substrates for the transporters. The study in healthy volunteers demonstrates that medications that are substrates of these transporters can be safely co-administered with finerenone.

Results From Phase I Studies Investigating the Dose Linearity of Finerenone Tablets and the Influence of Food or pH-Modifying Comedications on its Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Male Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Finerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that reduces the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical phase I studies with finerenone were carried out to assess its pharmacokinetics and the influence of common covariables on its absorption after oral administration. METHODS: Three crossover studies in healthy male volunteers with single-dose administration of finerenone investigated the dose linearity of a film-coated tablet (1.25-10 mg [n = 24] and 10-20 mg [n = 18]), the effect of food on the 20 mg tablet (n = 18), and the effects of the proton-pump inhibitor omeprazole (4 days pre-treatment and co-administration 2 h before finerenone) and an aluminum/magnesium hydroxide-containing antacid (10 mL [Maalox®] 70 mVal, simultaneous intake) on the 10 mg tablet (n = 10 and n = 11, respectively). RESULTS: Finerenone was rapidly absorbed (time to reach maximum plasma concentration [tmax] was 0.50-0.75 h). Area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC∞) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) increased in proportion to dose in the range investigated in clinical phase II and phase III studies (1.25-20 mg), with point estimates for the ratio of dose-normalized AUC∞ and Cmax (20 mg/10 mg, approved therapeutic doses) of 0.9943 and 0.9301. After the administration of finerenone 20 mg with a high-fat, high-calorie meal, AUC∞ increased (+ 21%), Cmax decreased (-19%), and tmax was prolonged (2.47 vs. 0.75 h) when compared with the fasting state. Omeprazole had no effect on finerenone AUC∞ and Cmax. Maalox had no effect on finerenone AUC∞ and led to a non-clinically-relevant decrease in Cmax (-19%). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of the finerenone film-coated tablet were linear. High-fat, high-calorie food had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of finerenone. In addition, pH-modifying comedications were not found to alter the pharmacokinetics of finerenone and were deemed safe for co-administration.

Finerenone is a drug that is used to reduce the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes and is licensed for use in several countries worldwide. Previous clinical trials analyzed the absorption of finerenone and how finerenone is distributed in, and eliminated from, the body (plasma concentrations) in healthy individuals. The present studies aimed to assess the absorption of finerenone by comparing dosages that are used in the real world to treat patients. In addition, different factors that would impact the absorption and plasma concentrations of finerenone (referred to as the pharmacokinetics of finerenone), including the presence of food and drugs that affect stomach acid levels, were investigated. Researchers found that the plasma concentrations of finerenone increase in proportion to the dose levels. A high-fat, high-calorie meal reduced the rate of finerenone absorption but did not have a significant impact on the amount of drug absorbed, and it can therefore be taken with or without food. When investigating finerenone administered in combination with drugs affecting stomach acid levels, researchers found that these drugs do not impact its pharmacokinetics and can be taken safely with finerenone.

Determination of finerenone - a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist - in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in venous and capillary human plasma.

A straightforward and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay allowing the sensitive and selective quantitation of finerenone (BAY 94-8862) in lithium heparin human plasma is described. Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of chronic kidney disease. Finerenone quantitation is performed after addition of its stable isotope-labelled internal standard (ISTD) by protein precipitation with acidified acetonitrile followed by HPLC-MS/MS separation and detection. The determination of finerenone concentrations was validated for a plasma volume of 0.100 mL and subsequently also for a lower plasma volume of 0.010 mL, collected e.g. in paediatric studies. The analytical range was from 0.100 µg/L (lower limit of quantification) to 200 µg/L (upper limit of quantification). Inter-day accuracy was 99.7-105.0% for the plasma volume of 0.100 mL and 101.1-104.5% for the plasma volume of 0.010 mL. Inter-day precision was ≤ 7.0%, independent of the extracted plasma volume. A moderate, concentration-independent matrix effect on ionisation was observed for both finerenone and its ISTD of 0.535-0.617, which is fully compensated by the ISTD (ISTD-normalised matrix factors were 0.98-1.03). The assay was successfully applied with both validated plasma volumes to a clinical phase I study in which the pharmacokinetics of 20 mg finerenone were compared in capillary plasma (0.010 mL) and venous plasma (0.100 mL) in a concentration range from the lower limit of quantification to 310 µg/L (capillary plasma) and 252 µg/L (venous plasma). The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve was similar in both matrices, while maximum concentrations were 37% higher in capillary plasma. In conclusion, capillary sampling should not bias pharmacokinetic exposure estimates compared with venous plasma values, if limited to sampling times in the distribution and elimination phases of finerenone.

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Interaction Profile of Vericiguat: Results from Three Randomized Phase I Studies in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Vericiguat, a direct stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase, has been developed as a first-in-class therapy for symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction < 45%. METHODS: Safety, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between vericiguat and drugs used in HF (sacubitril/valsartan [SV] and aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid]) or with a narrow therapeutic index (warfarin) were evaluated in three phase I studies. RESULTS: Vericiguat 15 mg (single dose [SD]) had no effect on bleeding time or platelet aggregation when coadministered with aspirin 1000 mg versus aspirin alone: estimated differences in least squares means 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 90.4 to 95.8) and 2.4% (95% CI - 7.0 to 11.8) turbidimetry, respectively. Vericiguat 10 mg (once daily) had no effect on coagulation inhibition elicited by warfarin 25 mg (SD; mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 96 h for clotting parameter treatment comparisons approximated 100.0%). There were no clinically relevant PD changes whether SV 97/103 mg was administered with single or multiple doses of vericiguat 2.5 mg or placebo (differences in systolic blood pressure [BP] - 1.66 mmHg [90% CI - 4.22 to 0.90]; diastolic BP - 1.80 mmHg [90% CI - 3.24 to - 0.36]; heart rate - 0.33 beats/min [90% CI - 2.25 to 1.60]). Vericiguat demonstrated no PK interactions when coadministered with aspirin, warfarin, or SV at steady state. Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of vericiguat with SV, aspirin, or warfarin was well tolerated. No clinically relevant PD or PK interactions were observed, supporting concomitant use of these drugs, commonly used by patients with HF, with vericiguat and no dose adjustment. EUDRACT NUMBER: 2014-000765-52; 2014-004880-19; 2015-004809-16.

The effects of vilaprisan on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive-A randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The primary objective was to explore whether the suppression of ovarian activity induced by a combined oral contraceptive (COC) is influenced by the simultaneous intake of the selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) vilaprisan (VPR). METHODS: In this exploratory randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 71 healthy premenopausal women were randomized (1:1) to receive either 2 mg/d VPR or placebo for 3 months. Concomitantly, a COC (0.15 mg levonorgestrel, 0.03 mg ethinyloestradiol) was administered in a cyclic regimen. Ovarian activity (Hoogland score based on follicle size and hormone concentrations), cervical function (Insler score), bleeding pattern and endometrial thickness/histology were assessed before treatment, in treatment cycle 3 and during follow-up. RESULTS: The known COC-driven suppression of ovarian activity was mildly affected by VPR. COC+VPR group: 22, 0 and 6% of the subjects had Hoogland scores of 4 (active follicle-like structures), 5 or 6 (ovulation). COC+placebo group: 14% of the subjects had a score of 4 and none a score of 5 or 6 (Bayesian analysis for Hoogland score = 4, median difference in response rate: 7.5%; 90% credible interval [-8.5; 23.5%]). COC effects on cervical function were moderately affected (mucus more sperm permeable under COC+VPR). COC withdrawal bleeding, in contrast, was absent in 81% of the subjects receiving COC+VPR vs 0% receiving COC+placebo. CONCLUSION: The SPRM VPR interfered with the pharmacodynamic effects of the COC. Therefore, full contraceptive effectiveness cannot be assumed without final judgement by a Pearl index study. Women on SPRMs should be advised to use nonhormonal contraception methods.

Safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic characterization of vericiguat: results from six phase I studies in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: To characterize the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of vericiguat in healthy males. METHODS: Six phase I studies were conducted in European, Chinese, and Japanese males. Subjects received oral vericiguat as a single dose (0.5-15.0 mg solution [for first-in-human study] or 1.25-10.0 mg immediate release [IR tablets]) or multiple doses (1.25-10.0 mg IR tablets once daily [QD] or 5.0 mg IR tablets twice daily for 7 consecutive days). Bioavailability and food effects on vericiguat PK (IR tablets) were also studied in European subjects. RESULTS: Overall, 255 of 265 randomized subjects completed their respective studies. There were no deaths or serious adverse events. Vericiguat was generally well tolerated at doses ≤ 10.0 mg. In the first-in-human study, the most frequent drug-related adverse events were headache and postural dizziness (experienced by five subjects each [7.2%]). Three of four subjects who received vericiguat 15.0 mg (oral solution, fasted) experienced orthostatic reactions. Vericiguat (≤ 10.0 mg, IR tablets) was rapidly absorbed (median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ≤ 2.5 h [fasted]) with a mean half-life of about 22.0 h (range 17.9-27.0 h for single and multiple doses). No evidence for deviation from dose proportionality or unexpected accumulation was observed. Administration of vericiguat 5.0 mg IR tablets with food increased bioavailability by 19% (estimated ratio 119% [90% confidence interval]: 108; 131]), reduced PK variability, and prolonged vericiguat absorption relative to the fasted state. CONCLUSION: In general, vericiguat was well tolerated. These results supported further clinical evaluation of vericiguat QD in patients with heart failure. REGISTRY NUMBERS: EudraCT: 2011-001627-21; EudraCT: 2012-000953-30.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of the Novel Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator Vilaprisan in Participants With Renal Impairment.

This open label, parallel-group study investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral 2-mg dose of the novel selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan in participants with impaired renal function compared with age, weight, sex, and race matched controls with normal renal function. Systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) and maximum observed concentrations (Cmax ) were compared among 9 participants with moderate renal impairment and matched controls by ANOVA. An additional 4 participants, each with severe renal impairment or normal renal function, contributed to a linear regression analysis exploring any monotone relationship between individual variables and the estimated glomerular filtration rate. The geometric mean AUC was increased by a factor of 1.35 in renally impaired participants compared to normal controls (not statistically significant: least squares mean, 1.346; 90% confidence interval, 0.918-1.973). Cmax was similar in participants with moderate renal impairment and normal renal function (least squares mean, 1.026; 90% confidence interval, 0.779-1.351). Considering the overall variability, there was no correlation between renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) and Cmax or AUC of vilaprisan. Single oral administration of vilaprisan 2 mg was well tolerated by all participants, both men and women and irrespective of renal function. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across all groups. Results from this study do not indicate that a dose adjustment will be necessary for vilaprisan when treating patients up to moderate renal impairment.

Results from Drug-Drug Interaction Studies In Vitro and In Vivo Investigating the Effect of Finerenone on the Pharmacokinetics of Comedications.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In vivo studies were performed with the novel, selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone to assess the relevance of inductive and/or inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes observed in vitro. METHODS: CYP isoenzyme-specific substrates were incubated in vitro with finerenone or its metabolites to investigate reversible and irreversible inhibitory as well as inductive potential. Three crossover studies in healthy male volunteers investigated the effects of finerenone (20 mg orally) on the pharmacokinetics of the index substrates midazolam (CYP3A4, n = 30), repaglinide (CYP2C8, n = 28) and warfarin (CYP2C9, n = 24). RESULTS: Finerenone caused direct inhibitory effects on CYP activities in vitro in the rank order CYP2C8, CYP1A1 > CYP3A4 > CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, but not on other major CYP isoforms. Moreover, irreversible inhibition of CYP3A4 was observed. The major metabolites of finerenone demonstrated minor reversible inhibition of CYP1A1, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 with no hint of time-dependent inhibition of any CYP isoform. Calculations from in vitro data according to regulatory guidelines suggested likely inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 in vivo, whereas this was not the case for CYP1A1, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Furthermore, finerenone and three of its metabolites were inducers of CYP3A4 in vitro with predicted weak-to-moderate in vivo relevance. Studies in healthy volunteers, prompted by these results, demonstrated no effect of finerenone on CYP isoenzymes for which in vitro data had indicated potential inhibition or induction. CONCLUSION: Administration of finerenone 20 mg once daily confers no risk of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with substrates of cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Pharmacokinetics of the Novel, Selective, Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone in Healthy Volunteers: Results from an Absolute Bioavailability Study and Drug-Drug Interaction Studies In Vitro and In Vivo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Finerenone is a selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. In vivo and in vitro studies were performed to assess absolute bioavailability of finerenone, the effect of metabolic enzyme inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of finerenone and its metabolites, the quantitative contribution of the involved enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP2C8 and the relevance of gut wall versus liver metabolism. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of finerenone (1.25-10 mg orally or 0.25-1.0 mg intravenously) were evaluated in healthy male volunteers in four crossover studies. Absolute bioavailability was assessed in volunteers receiving finerenone orally and by intravenous infusion (n = 15) and the effects of erythromycin (n = 15), verapamil (n = 13) and gemfibrozil (n = 16) on finerenone pharmacokinetics were investigated. Finerenone was also incubated with cryopreserved human hepatocytes in vitro in the presence of erythromycin, verapamil or gemfibrozil. RESULTS: Finerenone absolute bioavailability was 43.5% due to first-pass metabolism in the gut wall and liver. The geometric mean AUC0-∞ ratios of finerenone (drug + inhibitor/drug alone) were 3.48, 2.70 and 1.10 with erythromycin, verapamil and gemfibrozil, respectively. The contribution ratio of CYP3A4 to the metabolic clearance of finerenone derived from these values was 0.88-0.89 and was consistent with estimations based on in vitro data, with the remaining metabolic clearance due to CYP2C8 involvement. CONCLUSION: Finerenone is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 in the gut wall and liver. Increases in systemic exposure upon concomitant administration of inhibitors of this isoenzyme are predictable and consistent with in vitro data. Inhibition of CYP2C8, the second involved metabolic enzyme, has no relevant effect on finerenone in vivo.